Hacking’s Just Fine (If You’re Rich)

Saturday, December 8th, 2012

Sheffield’s own Hallam University student Richard O’Dwyer this year faced extradition to the United States where he could have faced up to five years in prison for copyright infringement. His crime? He dared to use his entrepreneurial spirit to create the TVShack.net website, which allowed people to search for and share links to television shows and films available, in full, across the web. Quite a clever idea, I’m sure we all agree, since he was simply providing a resource for people to access the pirate sites, not pirating anything himself, nor hosting torrents for these to be downloaded. But this kind of entrepreneurship is frowned upon because O’Dwyer was a Sheffield lad exploiting a chink in the armour of the entertainment industry, and not the entertainment industry itself.

British Home Secretary Theresa May actually approved the U.S. request for extradition, after rejecting a similar request over Gary McKinnon, a London man with Asperger’s syndrome and depression who hacked into U.S. military systems ten years ago to try and find information on UFO’s.

I guess there isn’t much corporate sponsorship from the U.S. military for British politicians, eh? Because if you run a television show, film and video game company like Dreamworks – as David Geffen does – you might want to spend some time with a high-ranking New Labour bigwig like Lord Peter Mandelson at the Rothschild villa in Corfu, Greece, just before the introduction of the Digital Economy Act, one of the last gasp works of the New Labour project, in 2010, before it was killed off by the general election aftermath. The Digital Britain report had recommended that copyright infringements online should not result in such drastic measures as internet disconnection. But after a chat with Universal Music Group chief Lucian Grainge and his little vacation in Corfu, Lord Mandelson decided to suddenly take a firm stance in rejecting the recommendations of the Digital Britain report and call for harsh technical measures as proposed punishments, though adopting this position two months before public consultation had even been completed. As my partner Jane Watkinson recently pointed out to me, it’s something the Tories have done since: hold a consultation, listen, and then do what you wanted to do, anyway. Lord Mandelson might as well have holidayed in Llamedos. Never heard of it? Read it backwards.

So, as Britain suffers an economic depression partially thanks to cuts following a £1.5 trillion bail-out of the banking companies, and people lose jobs, seek what’s left of welfare benefits, and stay home finding cheap or free entertainment, they meanwhile face severe consequences of downloading programming, movies and music. Well now of course this media activist would never dream of doing it myself, but if I were ever to download music or movies, it might be because the expansive collection I’d accumulated over the years was never returned to me from my time in Canada, so if there’s ever a complaint from authorities, I’ll be sure to forward it over there…’kay?

Beyond people replacing or replenishing their stockpile of entertainment, folk rock legend Neil Young calls torrents “the new radio.” “I look at the radio as gone,” he said. “Piracy is the new radio. That’s how music gets around.” His point that the weakness of audio file-sharing online means lower qualities than what vinyl offered “in 1978” also supports the argument for artists to become true performers, making their money from the ability to sing and play well live while gigging prolifically. Radical concept, eh? This could mean that acts have to hold a more personal relationship with their audience while proving they’re as good as their tracks suggest they are, possibly cutting out middle-men via merchandise sales at shows…a dangerous concept to major entertainment companies like Dreamworks and Universal who want so much control of the contrived crap that fills most of the airtime.

Then there’s News Corporation, the second-largest media organisation and third-largest entertainment group on the planet that in 2010 contributed £1 million to the Republican effort in the States while supporting the Conservatives here in Britain. It is, of course, controlled by Rupert Murdoch – the tycoon who backed Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Tony Blair and George W. Bush, and largely ensures all of his “news” ventures perpetuate his political perspective, whether they be Fox News, Sky News, The Wall Street Journal, New York Post, The Sun, The Times, or The Australian.

A thorn in the side of Rupert Murdoch, Tom Watson MP spoke here in Sheffield this week as News Corporation have been submerged by an avalanche of allegations of hacking attempts – into accessing Gordon Brown’s private legal files, medical records, and bank account, as well as the into phones of NewsCorp media rivals, in addition to celebrities, soldiers’ families, even victims of crime and the 9/11 and 7/7 terrorism attacks, all for the benefit of their “news” outlets. Sickening as this is, the subsequent investigations and even the recommendations from the Leveson Inquiry often lack the same momentum of pursuit as those targeting lowly hackers in basements, file-sharers, or drunken kids on Facebook.

Yes, in the wake of the 2011 summer riots in Britain, 20 year-old Jordan Blackshaw and 22 year-old Perry Sutcliffe-Keenan created Facebook events organising “riots” of their own as, essentially, nothing more than a practical joke. Now, nobody turned up, and the pages were deleted with apologies. Yet the judge, Elgan Edwards QC, called this harmless and hilarious epic social media fail an “evil act,” adding, “Your conduct was quite disgraceful and the message you posted on Facebook chills the blood.” The obnoxious old fart then claimed that the only reason no one showed up to start a riot was entirely due to “the prompt and efficient actions of police,” – not, in fact, that people just aren’t inclined to start smashing shit up because of a Facebook status posted in a drunken stupor. The two lads were jailed for four years. Yes: four years. For creating and deleting a Facebook page that caused no harm to anybody.

I don’t know about you, but the judge’s words chill my blood, and his absolutely irrational, irresponsible claims seem provocative enough to instigate real riots. It’s a wonder hundreds of us aren’t going and creating all kinds of Facebook events to incite riots. Would they arrest us all? I guess the pages Facebook refuse to ban – such as those calling for violence against women – are just fine. This kind of attitude and wanton desire to destroy the lives of two otherwise harmless young people while revering the police is everything that’s wrong with Britain. To subject these lads to such misleading, melodramatic vitriolic scorn is absolutely vile, and the fact they’ve been sent down is an injustice and an affront to the very values and laws Elgan Edwards is supposed to stand up for. He should be ashamed, he should be sacked, and – if there was any actual justice – he’d be the one in the nick, preferably with all the blokes he sentenced over the years. Attacking and punishing innocent people who committed no crime is a crime itself – so by that rationale, this judge should be locked up.

The riots of 2011 saw many people take leave of their senses. Jane Watkinson and I, even amongst the Left, seemed like lone voices amongst the reactionary rants of so many people who bought into the demonisation of youth that Murdoch’s media, and most other media, took part in. The fall-out from Thatcherism’s Big Bang and subsequent rampant materialist individualism as a Tory government abolished the Future Jobs Fund and Education Maintenance Allowance, the riots were merely sparked by the latest in a long line of Met Police injustices, the social conditions ideal kindling for the raging rioting of the summer heat. When the bankers cost our country £1.5 trillion, no one is held to account; when young people damage private property, and steal sneakers and big screen television sets and the latest “must-have” gadgets, they’re punished even more than they already were by the terror of government policy.

This is today’s right-wing Britain – where costing your country money or stealing secrets is just fine, so long as you’re rich and powerful.

I wonder if I’ll get four years for posting this?

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

U.S. Election: From the Archives…

Tuesday, November 6th, 2012

Tonight’s the night.

Barack Obama’s again the target of those who either don’t think he’s right-wing enough, or don’t think he’s left-wing enough – all the while the Republicans block and scupper his attempts at progressive policies, and the radicals remain obstinately ignorant to context and claim he has complete power to act in a radical way even with a CIA, military industrial complex, corporate lobbying, and lame Democrats surrounding him constantly.

This last group are, of course, the ones who claim to be “principled”; the self-righteous who tell other Americans not to vote for Obama and instead vote for independents, even if it costs him the election and psycho Mitt Romney and his Republicans seize power and make Obama Capitalism look like a socialist state by comparison. These are the ones prepared to quite comfortably and uncompromisingly see women, ethnic minorities, and the poor suffer even more – for their precious little “principles.” They’re the ones threatening to happily hand the election to money Romney.

Sorry, folks, but I’m rooting for Obama. It’s a choice between him and Romney, straight and simple, and with that choice, who with a clear conscience can wish worse on other people? I’ll be watching the results tonight with my partner, Jane Watkinson, and tweeting away as we do.

For those who haven’t yet bought my collection of blog posts, Soon To Be Banned: Musings of a Media Activist, or read the posts the first time around on my old website, fear not! Not only am I releasing a brand-new collection of entries, and more, in the coming weeks, but I’m offering a few postings here for today’s election in the United States. Enjoy…


“Does it Matter Who’s President?” (from MediaActivist.com; April 22nd, 2008)

So Pennsylvania today has a key deciding factor in the Democratic Party’s choice of a leader in the hopes of breaking the eight-year Republican hold on the White House.

There are two reasons this race is so important.

Firstly, in spite of millions of Democratic votes that will go uncounted in 2008 (just as they had in 2000, and on a larger scale in 2004), the Republicans, as I’ve said before, are doomed; they never had any realistic candidates, and now the fully face-lifted John McCain is not only seeing through his nostrils these days, he’s also already been discredited mere hours after becoming his party’s leader.

Secondly, whether we like to admit it or not, the fact is that the decisions made in the United States will affect the whole world in some way. They refer to themselves as the “world’s policeman,” but it’s much more than that. Britain’s economy has been affected by America’s even more than next-door neighbors, Canada. How messed up is that? But it’s something we have to accept. They’re the big shots.

Once again, the whole world is watching, but this time the Republican elephant is old and tired and ready to be put out of its misery, while the Democratic donkey never had a chance like this before, because when people joke about one-sided elections by saying “a donkey could run, and still win,” this time it’s true!Except neither candidate is a donkey; this is the best crop of candidates in decades. Though I realize that’s not saying much.

Morrissey once sang that in America, “the President is never black, female, or gay,” but two out of three ain’t bad, because with the election now the Democrats’ for the taking, they have guaranteed us that the brand-new President of the United States will, in fact, be either black or female (let’s hope Pee-Wee Herman runs next time!)

Barack Obama hasn’t quite taken my previous suggestions that he cut interviews like wrestler-turned-actor Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, but he has, nonetheless, been impressive and charismatic. Sure, there are links to Antoin Rezko and the mob in Chicago. Sure, contrary to popular belief, his campaign has had an abundance of support from the corporations he’ll thus become indebted to. And sure, he’s still a capitalist. But just like the man himself says, this is about a different kind of politics, a kind of diplomatic politics, one that has no place for trigger-happy Texans or emphasis on religious faith.

Unfortunately, his opponent seems to have a short memory from her days inspiring the book and film Primary Colors, when the Clintons were agonizingly choosing to take the moral high ground against a mud-slinging Republican Party. She’s been pretty low throughout the campaign, using tactics you’d expect more from John McCain, who’s now lying low himself. It’s all about the Democrats, baby. Even when some of them are acting like Republicans.

Hillary Clinton gave up her fight to provide Americans with good health care, which she’s now hoping to make up for. But she also supported the attack on Iraq, and whilst, yes, it’s an international issue, and it sure is sexy, it’s still a pretty important factor, one that has an enormous effect on the world, and also gives us an idea of what kind of people certain politicians are.

But hoping for a Barack Obama win isn’t just about Iraq. Do you realize that the alternative option will plunge America into a monarchy? The Presidential list of over twenty years would be: Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton. That’s right: George HW Bush Sr (1988-1992), Bill Clinton (1992-2000), George W Bush Jr (2000-2008), and Hillary Clinton (2008-2012). Is that what America really wants? Because in that case, let’s just repeal its independence and put it under the rule of the Queen.

Barack Hussein Obama is a symbol that all is not lost in the United States of America. Choosing him would be proving that it doesn’t matter if you have dark skin or even have a name that sounds similar to America’s greatest two manufactured enemies from the last twenty years, and it’d also suggest that they’re not just going to shoot and ask questions later. What America needs now is a statesman, who will act rational – whether you agree with him or disagree with him. “Barack says he’s going to lay the smack down on some roody-poo candy-asses…but only after debating and deliberating first, because war sucks, jabronies.” Wouldn’t that be nice to hear for a change? The cycle can be broken.

The last time I was in the United States, in 2001, I took my feet from the ground of Pennsylvania onto a plane across the Atlantic, and never looked back, as the Twin Towers collapsed behind me and with them any sense of rationality, reason, or restraint. That was the last place I set foot. If they make the right choice today, it may well be the first place in the United States I want to set foot next.

 

“Four Million Americans Over The Top” (from MediaActivist.com; November 2nd, 2008)

“Here we go again,” you’re probably saying. “Another American election; the more things change, the more they stay the same.” It’s no surprise so many people are cynical. But people are also hopeful- it’s just that they’ve had their hopes dashed so many times they don’t like to build them up too much anymore.

Well, this election really does matter, more than any other in American history. Here, I’ll explain why. But first, we have to go back to the beginning, to the demise of the left, and to a place at the other side of the Atlantic…

In 1990s Britain, Bill Clinton was seen as an inspiration by Tony Blair, and there’s a reason for that: the party of the progressive movement couldn’t get elected in the system ruled by money, until the leader used his charm and smarm to trick the left into supporting him while selling-out his party to the same business interests his opponents courted – the Rupert Murdochs of the world that influenced the information people received, as well as the economy. The cynical sell-out strategy worked in the United States, and it worked in the United Kingdom, too.

Bill Clinton said he smoked marijuana but “didn’t inhale,” still getting into power with the backing of the corporations, the media and its moguls, pushing some progressive policies but also rewarding private interests by throwing ten million people off welfare, bombing Sudanese aspirin factories, and supporting sanctions that led to the deaths of half a million Iraqi children, his Democratic colleague Madeleine Albright explaining that “we think the price is worth it.” The seeds had been sown in the Middle East; forget the CIA-funded Ba’ath Party led by Saddam Hussein – it was the CIA training given to the Taliban’s Osama bin Laden that was really being used now to plot against America through Al Qaeda. We knew who really had the Weapons of Mass Destruction – those we sold them to!

Al Gore was set to take Clinton’s place, which the Democrats welcomed, since, despite economic growth, he experienced growth of another kind during his sex scandal with intern Monica Lewinski – over $6,000,000 of taxpayers’ money being spent on investigating the affair. However, we all know the next part of the story: Florida’s Secretary of State in charge of elections, Katherine Harris, paid $10,000,000 to Database Technologies to remove specific kinds of people from voter rolls, who just happened to be Democrat voters, while she just happened to be co-chairperson for the Republican campaign as well! Technically, the Republicans had fewer votes and lost the election, but the scam worked, and with a media portraying Gore as a sore loser, he stopped protesting to save his party’s public image, and the rest is history. Cocaine-user George W Bush Jr was the first man to be sworn-in amongst riots, not allowed to walk the last block to the white house, in a break from tradition. Heck, the whole thing was a break from tradition – back when I was a lad, it used to be that the candidate that got the most votes became President. Not anymore! I feel so old-fashioned now, believing in that “democracy” stuff.

Then came September 11th, 2001 – the day the Middle East struck back at Western aggression with mostly Saudi Arabians hijacking planes and flying them into the World Trade Center’s twin towers in suicide attacks. $3,000,000 was spent investigating the 9/11 atrocities, half the amount spent on the Lewinski affair, leaving all kinds of discrepancies unexplained, and suggesting that the deaths of three thousand people was less important than a stain on a dress. The important thing was that Bush’s lack of popularity was turned around when he suddenly became a “war president,” saying “I go to work with war on my mind,” meaning, conveniently, that he didn’t have time to pay much mind to social programs – slashing them because his big government needed the funds to build up arms to attack terrorists…wherever they may be.

Bush used the Al Qaeda terrorist attack on 9/11 and the nation’s grief and fear to justify passing the Patriot Act – legislation that eroded civil liberties and meant he could control and keep tabs on his own population to check for dissidents. He then ignored international law and, based on inconsistent intelligence, sent poor kids into harm’s way in, of all places, Iraq – having them shoot anything that moved, blowing everything to smithereens, and seizing the oil fields, before “liberating” anyone. The “War President” gave Vice-President Dick Cheney’s company, Halliburton, a big fat uncontested contract to “rebuild” Iraq – in the midst of 100,000 Iraqi civilian deaths and rising insurgency movements opposed to their country being occupied. But the paranoia, combined with millions more votes lost (not just in Florida, but also Ohio and New Mexico), put Bush Jr back into the White House for a second term, shocking the world, with most peoples citing not terrorists but the United States government itself as the greatest threat to peace on earth. The international community’s hatred towards America only grew.

Bush continued with making loose and outlandish connections between Al Qaeda and oil-rich Iraq, in spite of the fact that “Islamic” extremist Osama bin Laden and secular dictator Saddam Hussein hated each other’s guts. Presumably the fact that both Al Qaeda and Iraq had the letter Q in their names was enough for Bush’s so-called intelligence. The Bush-Blair “Downing Street Minutes” showed that the U.S. and U.K. had almost everything they needed to conquer Iraq: aircraft, tanks, bombs, guns – the only thing missing was an actual legitimate reason. So they did what most war criminals would do, and made up a story about Weapons of Mass Destruction being left lying around there for terrorists to pick up and play with, like kids left with matches.

After entering office with a substantial treasury surplus left by Clinton, War President Bush put the country trillions of dollars into debt, exacerbating extremism and terrorism worldwide – with everyone and their cleric arming themselves to the teeth! Meanwhile, the American people were more over-worked and underpaid than they’d ever been, getting poorer and lacking in welfare and health care, kept afloat by a short-term, unsustainable credit card system. America had caught a cold, and the world was hoping it wouldn’t sneeze.

Eventually, though, the American people were starting to spot the incredible illusion of coincidence – the illegal invasion of Iraq, the lack of WMDs there, the oil money, troops dying in huge numbers, people in poverty…and New Orleans, a city full of African-Americans, left to rot with the government ignoring the threat of Hurricane Katrina and the armed forces too busy in the Middle East to fully attend to the clean-up – another city destroyed, another big contract for corporations to “rebuild” and essentially cleanse the place of “undesirables” (what Naomi Klein called Disaster Capitalism). While the media provided us with some disturbingly racist portrayals of “black looters” in New Orleans, the real looting of the devastated Iraq was carried out not by the Iraqi people themselves, but Western corporations. However, even they were realizing that it wasn’t going to be easy to set-up shop in Iraq. The popularity of the War President waned when what he’d called a “mission accomplished” became, in essence, another Vietnam, a war of attrition with young troops fighting for years, put to battle against angry Iraqis wanting their country back.

While New Orleans drowned, Bush’s approval ratings sank to record levels, eventually hitting 23%, surpassing even those of Richard Nixon at the time of his resignation in the wake of the Watergate scandal (26%), and making him the second most unpopular president in American history, just ahead of Harry Truman’s 1952 rating (22%). The American people had finally had enough, along with the rest of the world. America’s economic collapse – predicted by Noam Chomsky and echoed in my article ‘A Waterfall into the Mainstream’ – finally began; it sneezed, and the rest of the world caught that darned cold.

On February 12th, 2007, I wrote that the tide was turning, that things were about to change for the better. I claimed that without Chuck Hagel leading the Republicans, they really didn’t have any chance of legitimately winning the next election. I also suggested that Barack Obama might be a good choice to become Democratic leader, citing his ability to resemble wrestler-turned-actor Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, joking that he might ask “Do you smell what Barack is cookin’?” Maybe someone saw my blog and told him – because, lo and behold, what does he do? He goes on top professional wrestling show Monday Night Raw itself to parody The Rock and actually asks “Do you smell what Barack is cookin’?” Sometimes the accuracy of my predictions scares even me. I’ll have to be more careful in future!

On April 22nd, 2008, I blogged about the Democrats needing to choose Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton not just because of his different approach, but because he represents a change in Washington – not the rhetoric he speaks, but real change from a potential Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton twenty year monarchy of the elite. The Democrats chose him, the most progressive of all the candidates. For the first time in a long time, there was a chance for real change in American politics.

As it happened, Barack Obama – who had massive grassroots support and garnered a staggering estimate of 88% of his campaign funds from ordinary people giving small donations – gave his Democratic leadership acceptance speech on the 45th anniversary of another famous speech; the one by Martin Luther King when he told the world of his “dream.”

So many struggles had taken place over the last century, and this was to be another. The civil rights movement gained rights for African-Americans. The suffragettes died to gain women the right to vote. The allies fought fascism in the Second World War, defeating the Nazis who had risen in poverty-stricken Germany after the country was brought to its knees by the First World War. It was in that war that so much human life was sacrificed in record numbers. The soldiers dreaded the moment they were told to go “over the top” – to leave the trenches and head onto the fields, often doomed to be mowed-down by heavy artillery.

The facts suggest as many as four and a half million Democratic votes will be lost in this election. As Greg Palast told buzzflash.com, “four and a half million votes are going to be shoplifted.” Palast, the investigative journalist who via the BBC exposed the Florida scam in 2000, and the voter fraud in 2004, went on to explain that “that doesn’t mean that they will own the White House, it just means that they start with a big old thumb on the electoral scale.” That gives John McCain a head-start of at least four million votes already. I’ve always said that there can be no Ralph Nader excuses – Jesse Ventura is right; America needs more than just two capitalist choices. Two choices is not a true democracy. But there can be no excuses about lost votes, either. The American people have to give Barack Obama so much of an overwhelming majority that those four million votes don’t even matter, so that four million people go “over the top” first, are sacrificed, and then the other brave troops of democracy stand up and be counted, achieving victory for the Democrats.

Then there are hoax stories of extremists from the Barack Obama camp, and talk of a possible “Bradley-Wilder Effect,” where the polls are showing people are voting for the black man, but will do the opposite when in the privacy of the voting booth. I’m not sure about that – while Britain is full of racist media right now and “there ain’t no black in the Union Jack,” I think Americans are ready to have black represent their flag, and put a black man in the White House.

But ultimately, as Shami Chakrabarti said in the closing scenes of my film Escape from Doncatraz, “people aren’t any less political than they’ve ever been, they’re just less party political.” In some cases giving him a ten-point lead, it’s not just the polls that show Barack Obama with a lead over John McCain, it’s the streets – where, for example, in Fort Wayne, Indiana, a friend of mine walked around this traditionally Republican territory and saw nothing but Barack Obama yard signs. There are some stating “Republicans for Obama.” Even Republican Colin Powell recently endorsed Barack Obama. Colin freakin’ Powell! This is incredible. How did this happen?!

For starters, John McCain insulted the people, his own people, when – in the absence of Hillary Clinton from the election race – he cynically “chose a vagina” (to quote suicidegirls.com) as his running mate in hopes he’d garner some female voters. Alaska governor Sarah Palin, a supposed “soccer mom” who had charged the state for her kids’ travel expenses, claimed she had foreign policy experience “because Alaska shares its borders with Russia and Canada,” became a complete liability, and had even less major political experience than Barack Obama – who himself chose as his running mate one Joe Biden, one of the least wealthy men in Washington, a man who commutes to work every day.

The Republican voters – even those in the south – have switched sides, fearing “more of the same” from the GOP (even while Bush is essentially kept off TV to distance the campaign from his legacy), fearing 72 year-old John McCain’s demise during office, and thus fearing Sarah Palin left in charge of the country. Yep, in Fort Wayne and cities like it all over the United States, people are switching sides.

This is the ultimate slap in the face of the corrupt capitalist mob in the GOP who claimed there was a link between Iraq and Osama, who lied to them for so long, who took their hard-earned money and spent it on war, who drove the country into a financial crisis. These ordinary people slapped those bastards in the face by instead supporting a candidate who opposed the invasion and massive military spending from the start, who wants to open diplomatic dialogue with the Middle East, supports a social safety net and universal health care and investment in education, a man who not only smoked pot but inhaled as well, in addition to sucking up cocaine in school too…and, yes, a man whose name rhymes with “Iraq” and “Osama” and has Hussein as his middle name! Ha, ha! This is a message from the American people that they’ve had enough of living in fear and paranoia and propaganda, and of being broke. They’ve had enough of the status quo and the predicament they’ve been put in.

Republicans are crying about the Democrats’ campaign funds being spent on TV commercials when they “could be used to fix the economy.” What? The campaign funds are for, um, campaigning, duh; so when he is President, he can fix the economy. What a stupid, imbecilic and idiotic thing to say (though to be fair it did come from Arnold Schwarzenegger). So, when that argument fails – despite the fact that the Republicans control leading network Fox News – they complain about “media bias.” Well, the fact is that John McCain’s been flying by military jet, while Barack Obama’s invited the press on his planes with him. Besides, the media haven’t been able to control this machine – and everyone knows they like to back a winner. Nope, not even those stupid voting machines could stop the real machine.

There’s still a lot of right-wing media in America, though; almost all of it, and the attacks on Barack Obama have been significant, even at risk of turn-off from American viewers sick of cynicism. They call him a “socialist,” as though the existence of their libraries, schools, fire service and police force is not through socialist policy, when in fact it is; those are socialist principles. Obama’s said he’s a capitalist, a “free marketeer,” and it’s true; he’s about as much of a socialist as John F Kennedy, a man who also faced such accusations when in fact he was a major capitalist himself. However, Barack Obama speaks of Franklin D Roosevelt’s “New Deal” policies with admiration, and like JFK knows that all the clever capitalists in the last century have only prevented total socialist revolution by “tweaking the valve” – giving the people just enough to keep them from revolting. That’s not such a bad thing, considering that in the United States you only have two capitalist choices, anyway.

Barack Obama and the Democrats answer to different groups than the Republicans. If, like JFK, he is assassinated, Barack Obama will be martyred and the LA riots of 1992 would look like a mere playground fight, so he’s untouchable. If, however, he sells-out and betrays the grassroots groups that put him in power, he won’t be in power for long. He has to deliver, and he will – just don’t expect anything socialist, as the right-wingers are screaming. The capitalists in congress and the media would unanimously assault him, then, for sure.

We already know who the majority of people will be voting for: the Democrats – just like in the last two elections! My predictions may have a good track record, dear readers, but I don’t know what the result of this election will be; none of us do. But the change has already begun, regardless of the outcome. If Democratic voters send more than four million of themselves “over the top,” then Barack Obama will certainly be the next leader of the most powerful, most influential nation on the planet. But even if that doesn’t happen, and the GOP steal yet another election, that nation has already embraced change. The system may be broken, but the power is coming back to the people.

Leave the lights on. As Leonard Cohen once sang, “democracy is coming to the USA.”

 

“Angel of the Public Interest” (from MediaActivist.com; February 26th, 2009)

“The night after I was sworn in, I waited for a visit from the angel of the public interest. I waited all night, but she did not come. Federal Communications Commission chief Michael Powell, an avid deregulation advocate and son of Colin Powell.

Does media matter? That’s what I’m asked a lot.

Well, ask yourself how many of your opinions have been formed by something you heard, something you saw; a television show, a magazine, a song, a movie, a newspaper, or even a conversation – which, in turn, was likely largely based on opinions formed from…media! Sorry, but there’s really no way around it, honey. Media controls the world. That’s just how it is. The more we’re informed, the more our opinions are formed.

But who controls the media? I guess that’s pretty important, then, eh? Well, unfortunately, it’s being left to rich, greedy, white, right-wing men in suits who – funnily enough – have the tendency to tell twisted tales to the people consuming their media, so that they keep hating each other and voting the right-wing political parties into power. That’s pretty much how the whole thing works, right there.

In Britain, after boom-and-bust Conservative strategies left the incoming Labour government in economic turmoil – subjected to the (first) Winter of Discontent – Margaret Thatcher led the Tories back to power in 1979 with help from not just the clever, cynical, fake and now-infamous “Labour Isn’t Working” billboard poster designed by advertising agency Saatchi & Saatchi, but also Rupert Murdoch’s tabloid newspaper The Sun encouraging the population to vote for the Tories, like an evil nanny feeding a starving child arsenic and telling them “It’s good for you,” and it being trustingly gulped back.

No doubt many working class people – feeling that Labour had already significantly compromised their socialist approach moulded three decades earlier by the great Clement Attlee – felt less enthusiastic about voting for Labour again. That’s to be expected. But it was predominantly the less industrial, more middle class, more suburban south of England that provided the push needed to solidify the support necessary to put in – and keep in – a Conservative government, all the way to 1997.

The Tories didn’t simply fall from favour in 1997. No, it’s no coincidence that Rupert Murdoch had become impressed by Tony Blair’s “Third Way” route for New Labour that promised to continue the media deregulation started by Thatcherism – so much so that he had his News Corporation, and indeed The Sun, support them…resulting, of course, in their rise to power. And also resulting in deregulation and near-monopolisation of the media for Mr Murdoch.

Sure enough, Blair’s Britain continued along that path, as did Bush’s United States. In 2003, Murdoch claimed Bush “will either go down in history as a very great president or he’ll crash and burn…I’m optimistic it will be the former.” He put his Fox News Network to work on making his hopes a reality, almost always portraying Bush in a good light, discrediting his critics, and – most crucially – omitting certain facts about him and his party, only increasing the role of the channel as being, in actuality, Faux News, while Murdoch bought MySpace two years later, and continued his quest for his right-wing domination of the media world, and the people of the planet showed the propaganda wasn’t completely succeeding as millions marched in streets across the globe in opposition to the U.K.-U.S. led illegal invasion of Iraq.

The Bush administration, of course, didn’t let these deeds go without reward. In the spring of that same year, Colin Powell’s son, Michael Powell, in his role as chief of the Federal Communications Commission, set about dismissing thirty year-old rules while further loosening restrictions on just how much media could be controlled by a single company like News Corp. These changes threatened to allow a single network to buy stations that, combined, reached as much as a staggering 45% of the American people.

Think about that for a moment: one ideology, one message, one slant – bombarding as many as almost a half of all Americans. Murdoch could control the information of entire cities in the world’s most powerful nation. Yep, deregulation was still being attempted in return for propaganda and campaign funds donated to the bigwigs by the media moguls. It was becoming a tired old sick joke.

Speaking of sick jokes, Powell simply stated, “The night after I was sworn in, I waited for a visit from the angel of the public interest…I waited all night, but she did not come.” This pissed off a lot of people, with leading media activist Aliza Dichter responding, “Since he had trouble seeing one angel that dreadful night on March 22nd, we shall descend upon him in droves!” and Indy Media announcing “We encourage all Angels such as yourself to come to the gathering dressed in your best Angel garb – halo, wings, glitter, the whole nine yards. (If no angel gear, come anyway!)”

They’re still waiting for the droves of angels to descend on the FCC, and I’m very tempted to come to Washington, D.C. myself. There are all kinds of media activist opportunities there, because it’s the seat of power, and if I’m allowed there, I’ll be helping to kick the legs from under it along with the rest of the people wanting change through responsible, fair media.

Barack Obama’s great. The media has pleasantly focused on the fact that, for the first time ever, an African-American now resides in the White House. Why trivialise it? Why reduce it to tokenism? He got where he is today because he wasn’t Colin Powell; he represented the wishes and hopes and dreams of America. He made promises he is already struggling to keep while under pressure from the same old system – be it by appeasing the military industrial complex by pulling forces from Iraq and simply putting them into Afghanistan, or by using the economy as an excuse to put progressive policies on the back-burner. Yes, his achievement is historic, yes it’s important – but we must not forget the real reason he was put into power, because a black man means nothing unless he represents the people, and nor does a woman.

Deregulation was pushed to unprecedented places by Margaret Thatcher, one of the most devastating Prime Ministers in British history. That’s something worth remembering. And with that in mind, it’s time to take back control of the airwaves and the printing presses, because once Murdoch and his ilk have had their way, we’ll only get their side of the story.

When the media lie, they get sued. So what do they do instead? Omit. It’s lies through omission. If someone threatens you and your loved ones, and provokes you into threatening them in return, to then accuse you of threatening behaviour would only be part of the story, and, some might say, as bad as lying. That’s what the mainstream media do: they lie through omission. Omitted details about immigration, about Iraq, about Palestine, about Ireland, about everything. There are certain things they’d rather you didn’t know about or focus on. Because if you did? You’d be ripping their papers and brand-new asses for their bosses; you’d be organising and forcing change.

Ever noticed how everyone complains about how hard life is, and how much they work, yet things just largely stay the same? Ever wondered how that’s even possible? They filter the information; they tell you that the arsenic is good for you! Everything’s okay; just blame the immigrants. Everything’s alright; blame the benefit frauds. Everything’s fine; blame the poor who went into debt. Whatever you do, don’t even consider questioning capitalism’s free market or why there are just a few privileged people with eight-bedroom mansions, limousines and lear jets, while the mass majority in the world are struggling, and 1.4 billion live in official poverty.

What the media clues you in on is nowhere near as important as what they’ve left out. It can be quotes, statistics, editorials, and the screaming headlines themselves – overpowering or even replacing a few extra crucial details to the story. Given the fact that more and more of the media is being controlled by fewer and fewer people – with right-wing interests in contrast to the interests of the mass majority – our information is being controlled more and more, as well. It’s being filtered. But heck, information is too important to our lives to be left in the hands of the right who are doing us wrong. We have to do something.

Get involved. Be an angel.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Splatter Goes My Heart

Monday, October 31st, 2011

“Viewers may find the following images disturbing.”

It’s strange how we’ve often protected people from the horrors of reality, whilst peddling graphic fictional films to the public.

On TV in 2003, we saw the illegal invasion of a sovereign nation who hadn’t threatened us, but all the majority of news media showed us was a distant fireworks display above Baghdad, Iraq. The United States were so determined to conceal the flag-draped coffins from view after learning from the public relations disaster that was the Vietnam war thirty years earlier that they created press pools to tell the media exactly what was happening, in The Truth According to the Department of Offense Defense.

One million innocent civilians died as a result of that invasion. Protests continued, but whilst they battered the political credibility of Tony Blair and George W. Bush – with the former resigning and the latter suffering the lowest popularity ratings of any President since Harry Truman – they weren’t enough to outright stop the onslaught. The corporate mainstream media succeeded in predominantly covering much of the military assault as a legitimate conflict, refraining from conveying the impact of a million dead and thousands wounded, amputated, or scarred for life, both physically and mentally. That’s horror. Horror we didn’t see.

I’ve often said, news media needs to be more violent; entertainment media needs to be less violent. On this All-Hallows-Eve, I felt it appropriate to explain why, and to look at the concept of media horror in that context, drawing on something I’ve been meaning to refer for some time.

Not long ago, I was interviewed on the subject of horror films by film and video graduate Claire Watkinson as part of her research into the genre. I was asked to discuss the impact of “splatter” movies as a relatively recent phenomenon and how these have taken traditional horror to the next level.

Gone are the days of Max Schreck’s Nosferatu, or even Bela Lugosi’s Dracula; the suspense of their films or even those of genius Alfred Hitchcock are a fading philosophy. It’s now a culture of instant gratification, where filmmakers are offering chills, thrills and spills, spilling of blood, slashing of skin, splattering of guts, and blown-out brains as frequently as possible, each time gorier than the last.

The genre is darkly comedic in its absurd, throwaway, over-the-top approach, sometimes sort of satirical, but most often not. When they are not making a satirical statement, the dark humour is extremely manipulative in its desensitisation of violence, particularly towards women. Bereft of political/sociological awareness and invention, the aim has been to deliver as visually explicit a violent act as possible, which marks a regression in filmmaking. But there are a few welcome exceptions that offer a glimmer of hope in the darkness, some by both Claire Watkinson herself and my friend Brian Lockyer, both of whom have successfully penetrated the notoriously cliquey film festival circuit recently with their often-experimental indie works.

Even a Hollywood-based female director, however (in this case Mary Harron) has been able to take an utterly horrific, verging-on-misogynist novel by Bret Easton Ellis – American Psycho – and translate it to the screen with minimal misogyny and graphic, detailed, gut-wrenching violence found in most films – here, the misogyny was used as a statement about misogyny, and the violence was abhorrent without being blatant, so audiences saw the film for the message it was. In addition, the Blair Witch Project (harking back to Alfred Hitchcock’s methods) utterly petrified many audiences without showing almost anything at all; the viewer’s subjective imagination creating the horror for themselves. This proves that there are opportunities to create horror without this pornographic approach.

It can be argued that splatter films are another form of visceral pornography, a question raised by my interviewer. They say the difference between pornography and erotica is that the latter does not have to be blatantly visually explicit; it creates a subjective sense of sexuality and is not necessarily designed for the purposes of titillation. Likewise, the horror genre works best – artistically and ethically – when it creates room for a more subjective experience while making a specific point. The ability to make a statement, yet allow interpretations to be had subjectively, is after all the height of art.

As time has gone by, there has been an increase in awareness and liberal attitudes, buoyed by the French-driven Situationist International, and this has offered many progressions in the lives of people in society as prejudices have retreated. However, this – in addition to resistance of censorship – has often been used as an excuse to push the boundaries of explicitness. So, while there has always been “violence,” and “violence” in films, the representation of this violence has become more and more literal; blunt; blatant. In some cases it has even been OTT, which has an even worse effect by desensitising viewers to violence (see the “funny” scene in Pulp Fiction where Vincent Vega inadvertently blows off the head of a young African-American male without rhyme, reason, or artistic merit other than to lead to the director’s on-screen role in discussing “dead nigger storage”).

There has, again, been a mass-produced method of artistic and creative shortcuts where filmmakers have wanted to pay no mind to political points or consequences and more towards the of-the-moment approach of topping whatever has been done before in the visuals. This is representative of mainstream culture as a whole being, essentially, style over substance.

The irony of this movement was when Oliver Stone used violence in such an OTT, bombarding, almost oppressive way in his masterpiece Natural Born Killers in order to make a point about precisely that, and yet was promptly censored for it. Censorship is dangerous territory; interpretations are subjective, and all violent images are likely to be “triggering” in inducing trauma to some viewers, as well. So I am not advocating censorship.

The art and entertainment world – even professional wrestling – has always been the scapegoat for powers who pass policies harming societies, exploiting the poor, leaving people vulnerable, and generally – when forced to actually look at a cause instead of a cure (such as being “tough on crime”) – a useful place to point the finger towards as a form of “brainwashing.” (Interestingly, they do not accept this argument when the debate turns focus to corporate news and tabloid press – suddenly, then media is absolved of blame or responsibility).

There is a danger of powers calling for censorship of any creative form, because there is such a grey area and it is such a dark road to go down. I believe Heinrich Heine stated,

“where they burn books, they ultimately burn people”

Instead, just as with the “Axe Factor” mentality of pseudo-reality television, there needs to be a serious debate had around why these productions are being made, what they are doing to the culture, and what thought they provoke. When the excuse is “art for art’s sake,” then it’s an alarm bell for a piece of work that serves no purpose and makes no statement, and even dumbs-down the culture – why should this be funded? While private interests are in complete control of these sources of entertainment (moreso now that the UK Film Council has been predictably abolished by the Conservative government), they will bear no responsibility to contributing to society; there will only be an attempt to maintain the status quo and bolster the tried-and-tested studio formulas and reinforcements of the genre/star/auteur selling points to the public. To raise questions, is not a question for them.

So, yes, through this entertainment media, society becomes more immune to violence – for example, against women, or against the poor; one only has to sit with others when American Psycho’s main character, Patrick Bateman, stabs a homeless African-American man to murder him, then stomps his dog to death, to see what people are more horrified by (hint: it’s rarely the homeless man).

Meanwhile, perversely, corporate news continues to sanitise true life horror for us.

In Gaza – when, interestingly, the BBC reported “War In Gaza” while Al-Jazeera reported “War on Gaza” – only Al Jazeera itself had broadcast journalists on the ground showing bombs exploding around them. During the attack on Iraq mentioned earlier, when bombs were being dropped and men, women, and children were being murdered, most news programmes avoided broadcasting such images.

The image you saw at the top of this page was, from all accounts, very real: a photograph of an Iraqi man killed by the U.S. military. Images like that were allegedly used by American soldiers to trade, in exchange for sexual pornography. This is the desensitised culture being nurtured, where everything’s unreal, everything’s a video game, everything’s got a price.

It can be said, then, that desensitisation is inevitable when we live in a society where non-fiction violence is seen less, and fictional violence is rampant. Without seeing the realities of violence or its consequences, what messages are we sending to people? What is happening to the culture? It leaves me, for one, with a heavy heart indeed.

Claire Watkinson’s own horror film, Sitting Amongst the Apple Trees, premiered at the 2 Days Later short film competition festival this past weekend. Her company, Cherry Tree Productions, can be followed on Twitter.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

American Fall

Wednesday, October 5th, 2011

Many empires have fallen over the centuries. One of the greatest ever, of course, was the Roman empire, where – in the dying days of the Julio-Claudian dynasty – Nero was believed to have been responsible for the Great Fire of Rome so that land could be cleared for his planned Domus Aurea villas.

While it’s considered a myth that Nero played the fiddle as Rome burned to the ground, the accusations against him that compelled him to commit suicide before trial were based on his motivation for expanding his extravagant ways even if it meant destroying his own communities. That was the beginning of the end of a Roman collapse. Now comes the American fall.

The comparison of George W. Bush Jr to Nero, in Paula Cole’s protest song, “My Hero, Mr President,” may seem at first like another melodramatic slant as embellished as the fiddling story itself, but there are certainly parallels.

George W. Bush Jr, who came to power in extremely dubious circumstances, was the first president in recent history of the United States to break from the tradition of walking the last block to the White House after being sworn in, faced with protesters on the verge of rioting, raging against his party’s theft of their democracy. Son of George H.W. Bush Sr, he was often referred to as “King George the Second” due to the undemocratic manner in which he seized power.

Like his father – in conflict with their “small state” Reaganomics rhetoric – Bush Jr cut taxes for the elite while at the same time spending massively, in his case to fund aggressive and legally suspect military campaigns in the resource-rich Middle East, gifting obscene uncontested contracts to cabinet darlings like Halliburton to “rebuild” Iraq with taxpayers’ dollars.

As if this wasn’t dangerous enough for the American economy, then came the 2008 financial crisis where Bush’s other friends, Goldman Sachs, essentially held the nation to ransom as economist Max Keiser succinctly puts it, and were gifted $700 billion without the consent of American taxpayers (who were dead against it).

The damage this has done to the United States is incredible, and yet the corporate right-wing mainstream media never held many people to account, and instead denounced Barack Obama and his healthcare plans for the poor as “socialism.” The elite interests were hoping the distraction was enough for them to slip away with the loot.

It wasn’t.

The anger of the American people has been growing since they were first ignored, and so was a movement. Now, Wall Street itself is being occupied by thousands who have simply had enough. So called because of the seventeenth century wall built to keep out the poorer Native Americans who also saw many of their resources stolen, Wall Street today represents the greed Gordon Gecko declared “good” in Reagan and Thatcher years of mass financial deregulation so the bankers could run amok and Social Darwinism could take effect.

Students, shopkeepers, even pilots have all been marching onto Wall Street to demonstrate their intolerance of this reverse socialist transfer of wealth from the many into the deep pockets of the few. After the Arab Spring and the union actions in Wisconsin, many wondered when, or if, the U.S. would have it in it to show some people power there too. It took its time – it wasn’t in the spring, or even the summer – but now we are witnessing not an autumn, because they don’t call it that, but an American Fall.

However, something strange has been happening. Unless you’re there, you’re unlikely to be aware of it. The media have only given the attention the Wall Street protests warranted when there were arrests by police – a tried and tested media method of movement marginalisation, by discrediting; by disconnecting apathy from the consumer at home and the citizen on the street.

Fortunately, social media is increasing and despite reports of Facebook removing imagery of the Wall Street demonstrations, word is spreading. It is up to each and every one of the aware to awaken others, too.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Looting a Country

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2011

I had moved to the United States after dropping out of a university media degree in 2001 – my visa expired in September of that year, at which point I was expected to fly from Pittsburgh and/or New York City back to Britain before returning. I never did return (though I plan to, soon) – and luckily for me, my stay was cut short at the time, and I departed a few weeks earlier than originally planned.

I was in my parents’ house in England on September 11th when I watched New York’s Twin Towers of the World Trade Centre eerily fall into their own footprint after being hit by hijacked planes just days after I’d landed back in the UK. For days afterwards – even while hanging an American flag from my window – I wrote on my website at the time that people ought to stop for a moment and contemplate the reasons for such atrocities rather than race towards international incidents and conflicts.

Few of my friends back in the States at the time seemed to want to listen: their web pages featured slogans such as “kill ‘em all – let God sort ‘em out” meaning, essentially, that then-President George W. Bush had support for aggressive actions in retaliation. This led to the UK-assisted invasions of not just Afghanistan but also Iraq (which wasn’t even connected to the 9/11 attacks) – a legally questionable act that contributed to Tony Blair’s resignation as Prime Minister of Britain and Bush’s popularity plummeting to levels unseen since Harry Truman. Few now look back and feel that the world was a better place for such bombing campaigns.

In 2005, the UK experienced its own 9/11 – the London attacks on 7/7 – and again things were exacerbated. In my film Escape from Doncatraz (2008), I warned how, after the attacks, the surveillance state and fear of foreigners were both boosted, while British politicians were heading for a billion pound expenses scandal after looting from the public purse even as their media baron buddies were running front-page newspaper stories of immigrants coming into the country to supposedly drain resources from their respective poor, working class readerships. It’s an old game of distraction designed so that people at the bottom remain at the bottom – and instead of rocking the boat, simply blame others in the same boat.

As a knee-jerk response to the Blairite “New Labour” position, the British public failed to solidly award any party – including that one – majority of power in parliament, and the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats formed a Con-Dem coalition to govern the UK. They scrapped the ID card plan, but only because it was a populist maneuver heading into power, not because of ideological opposition to the concept – they were very much about reactive approaches to crime, not proactive ones. No, this was not a coalition about to deal with poverty, or Britain’s pay gap reaching Victorian era levels. After all, between them, the ConDems offered twenty-three millionaires in their cabinet.

Tory Prime Minister David Cameron had, as recently as 2008, supported Labour’s levels of government spending – then, after the staggering eight hundred and fifty billion pound bail-out of the banks, went into the election claiming the country was now in debt because of Britain’s public services that would need to be wiped-out or sold-off to private interests. As Margaret Thatcher-on-steroids, Cameron was essentially the head of the millionaires club, a Victorian-style Social Darwinist project beyond Thatcher’s wildest dreams.

Of course, to be able to sustain all this in front of the British public would, as always, require propaganda – so Cameron hired former News of the World editor Andy Coulson for this responsibility that he handled well, even as it was emerging that he oversaw a regime that hacked into people’s phones to dig for dirt. The London Metropolitan Police that you’d expect would go after such morally depraved criminals as these did not do very much, clearly too busy stopping and searching predominantly black youths in communities being devastated by some of the massive eighty billion pounds worth of Tory cuts.

People from poorer parts of London are no strangers to injustice and conflict.

  • In 1985, Brixton exploded with riots after The Met killed black woman Cherry Groce and a week later searched the home of another black woman, Cynthia Jarrett, who died of a heart attack as a result.
  • In 1993, black immigrant Joy Gardner died of a brain haemorrhage during a raid on her flat, with three Met officers tried for manslaughter but later acquitted.
  • No charges were brought after a 1994 Met police assault on black asylum seeker Oluwashijibomi “Shiji” Lapite, who consequently died.
  • In 1995, The Met fractured the skull of Brian Douglas, killing him, and Wayne Douglas died in police custody, prompting more riots in Brixton.
  • In Tottenham in 1999, mentally ill Roger Sylvester died while being “restrained” by members of The Met.

The list could go on and on. Scotland Yard seemed utterly untouchable throughout all of these incidents and inquests – rarely are The Met ever held accountable for killing black people like these.

A riot is the language of the unheard.

- Martin Luther King, Jr

Then of course, just weeks ago, Mark Duggan was shot dead by The Met. Two days later, about two hundred of Duggan’s relatives and residents of Tottenham’s impoverished Broadwater Farm social housing area marched peacefully on Scotland Yard to request explanations over the circumstances of Duggan’s death. They waited hours to speak to a higher-ranking member of The Met who yet again showed no regard for such life or any desire to be held accountable for their actions. Ignored and enraged, some of the groups of people erupted, and set police cars on fire. Word of the outrage spread like wildfire and other areas in London experienced anger and violence as well. Then, it spread to other cities, too.

Inevitably, innocent people got caught in the devastation wreaked by these disenfranchised, despondent people from depressed areas where anger spread across housing estates. Having been told – despite the billion pounds of expenses fiddled into the pockets of rich politicians in sharp suits preaching consumerism – that they would be the ones having to sacrifice such “luxuries” as local services to repay a bill created by the billionaire banks, hundreds of people finally exploded, smashed stores, burnt buildings, stole goods…and hundreds of them have been given disproportionate sentences that filled the prisons to the brim. Two young men who expressed support for the riots and looting via Facebook (despite reversing their opinions and apologising afterwards) were thrown in prison for four years because of it.

In Escape from Doncatraz, I pointed out the profits to be made – per head – from privatised prison populations rising, the UK’s now, since the riots, reaching 85,931 (dangerously close to the country’s maximum capacity of 88,093). Perhaps now more reactive methods can be put in place for more prisons to be built, and filled – for more profits to be posted.

Interestingly, the Tories had a stroke of good fortune with the timing of all this, too, as they pushed for tighter restrictions on social networking websites, and a return of capital punishment. They were also demonising anarchist political thinkers as “terrorists” as newspaper headlines screamed “Anarchy in the UK” above images of London burning behind hoodie-wearing youths.

In the film Bowling for Columbine, Flint county prosecutor Arthur Busch told documentarian Michael Moore how – after a black six year-old boy had shot a classmate with a handgun he found at his uncle’s house while his mother was dozens of miles away daily, working for her welfare – his office received so much pressure from everyday people to prosecute the six year-old: “They wanted this boy hung from the highest tree…there was such an undercurrent of racism and hate; it was ugly.” What struck me with this similarity was that some of the London rioters were as young as 11 – and met with the same merciless disgust that the TV population have always had towards black “savages.” What was evident were the undercurrents of racism weaved into our social fabric for years by the likes of the Conservative Party, who of course secured a surprise electoral victory in Birmingham Smethwick in 1964 with the slogan “If you want a nigger for a neighbour, vote Labour.”

The mainstream media wheeled out the victims, always being careful to avoid looking at the conditions that caused all this. Human interest stories of individual cases were focused on, stirring emotion through carefully selected incidents to focus on individuals rather than the society they exist within. Just as racism was stoked by media coverage of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina hit, yet again black people were pasted across news pages beside the word “looters.” It was like Bush’s line after 9/11: “You are either with us or you are with the terrorists” – everything had to be framed in black-and-white binary perspectives so that people feeling bad for the victims could not possibly begin to also feel bad for the angry.

If you’re not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.

- Malcolm X

Few people from the poor communities where the anger ignited were ever given airtime. When civil liberties campaigner Darcus Howe actually received an interview from the BBC’s Fiona Armstrong (aka “Lady MacGregor of MacGregor”), she simply called him a rioter when he tried to explain the reasons behind the riots.

The BBC apologised – the “Lady” did not, nor was she obliged to.

The elite remain in power – of party politics, and of the press – and while they are still escaping with billions and taking away the few libraries, youth centres, and opportunities poorer people had left, the poor people themselves not only have to carry that burden, but also the blame for this latest wave of violence. Ordinary people at home have been cleverly shown yet more images of scary-looking poor people – “chavs,” blacks, other demonised groups – and all it does is further fuel the ConDem coalition’s quest to transfer power and wealth from the majority to the elite minority. The looting of hundreds of billions of pounds has been carried out by this elite, and, remarkably, we are being punished for it, not them.

We have to act, before it’s too late. I’ll be attending a meeting in my city of Sheffield this week around the themes of defending young people and giving them a future. We can all make moves to prevent – not aid and abet – this frighteningly right-wing government agenda.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter